The new iPad's display is miles better than not just today's rival tablets, but tomorrow's: current Android tablets typically run 1280x800 displays, and the forthcoming full-HD tablets from the likes of Lenovo and Asus run at the same resolution as HD TVs, 1920x1080. That means the iPad has more pixels than a 1080p high-definition television, which maxes out at 1920x1080. The resolution is twice that of the iPad 2: it's running 2048x1536, and the iPad 2 runs 1024x768. They’re the sharpest displays, with the highest pixel density, on any Apple deviceĭid we answer all your Super Retina vs Liquid Retina display questions? No? Drop your questions/thoughts in the comments - we’d be happy to hear them.We think it is: in everyday use, the new iPad's screen is as crisp and as clear as our iPhone 4's, with no noticeable jaggies - or at least, none in apps that have been updated to take advantage of the new iPad's extra pixels. The OLED panels allow for an HDR display with the industry’s best color accuracy, true blacks, and remarkable brightness and contrast. I’ll leave you with Apple’s description of its Super Retina OLED display: However, iPhones with Super Retina display have better visual quality than their Liquid Retina counterparts, and generally more expensive. It is also a very impressive display and one of the best (LCD) displays you’d find on an iPhone. This isn’t to say that Liquid Retina is a gimmick though. Paper specs put aside, when it comes to actual usage, the Super Retina display is the better one as it sports higher resolution, deeper blacks, and more pixels spread across the surface. Super Retina vs Liquid Retina display: which one of the duo is better?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |